A second income of £1,000 a month from a Stocks and Shares ISA sounds simple enough. Build a large portfolio, reinvest the dividends, and let compounding do the rest.

But turning that idea into reality is far more dependent on how the portfolio is built than many investors realise.

The real driver of second income growth

That £1,000 a month second income from a Stocks and Shares ISA works out at £12,000 a year — implying a portfolio of roughly £300,000 using a 4% income assumption.

On the surface, that makes the goal feel straightforward: build a large enough ISA and the income follows.

But in practice, the path towards that figure can vary dramatically between investors. Small differences in returns and reinvestment can have a surprisingly large impact on how quickly an ISA becomes capable of generating meaningful second income.

The levers behind ISA second income

Rather than viewing second income as a fixed target, it can instead be broken down into three key variables: time, portfolio yield, and ongoing contributions.

Fix any two, and the third becomes the factor that determines how quickly the £1,000-a-month goal is reached.

The table below shows how changing the annual return alone can dramatically shorten the path to a £300,000 portfolio, even with the same £750 monthly contribution.

This is why stock selection matters. Stronger long-term returns and higher starting yields can materially reduce the time needed for an ISA to begin generating meaningful second income.

Stock picking

For investors trying to accelerate the path towards a meaningful second income, the FTSE 250 contains plenty of businesses still offering sizeable yields.

One that stands out to me is Aberdeen (LSE: ABDN). The asset manager currently offers a dividend yield of around 6.6%, despite the share price climbing roughly 75% over the past year.

I think investors are becoming increasingly optimistic about the company’s prospects. For years, the business struggled with persistent outflows from its key Adviser division. But recent results showed genuine improvement, with net outflows narrowing sharply as the group continues repositioning parts of the business.

What particularly interests me is the longer-term growth opportunity. Demand for self-directed investing and retirement products continues to grow, which plays directly into the company’s interactive investor platform. Customer demand for SIPPs has been especially strong.

At the same time, the group retains deep expertise in Asian and emerging market investing. Those regions lagged badly during the dominance of US mega-cap technology shares, but investor interest is now beginning to broaden into cheaper and less crowded markets.

There are still risks to consider. Asset managers remain heavily exposed to market sentiment, and prolonged weakness in global equities can pressure both flows and earnings. Aberdeen also still needs to prove that recent operational momentum is sustainable.

However, the combination of improving business momentum and a still-generous dividend yield is why I see the shares as one to consider for long-term second income investors.

The post How much do you need in an ISA for a £1,000-a-month second income? appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• Here’s how I’m targeting £11,363 in yearly second income from £20,000 in Aberdeen shares!

Andrew Mackie owns shares in Aberdeen. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

A £20,000-a-year passive income from a Stocks and Shares ISA implies a portfolio of roughly £500,000 based on a typical 4% income drawdown rate.

That’s a substantial figure — and for most investors, it quickly reframes the challenge. This is no longer just about saving steadily into an ISA, but about the type of investments needed to build meaningful long-term income power.

Rather than staying at the level of theory, I’ve highlighted two UK stocks I believe could be worth considering for investors aiming to move towards that kind of income target over time.

Cash king

Fresnillo (LSE: FRES) is not a typical FTSE 100 stock. As a leveraged play on precious metals, it can generate extraordinary cash when conditions are favourable.

FY25 showed that clearly. Revenue rose 27.6% to $4.6bn, EBITDA (earnins before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation) jumped more than 80% to $2.8bn, and profit before tax nearly tripled. Earnings per share increased more than fourfold year on year.

Importantly, this was achieved with average realised prices of around $43 for silver and $3,500 for gold. Despite recent weakness, spot prices remain well above those levels.

That matters because Fresnillo’s earnings power is highly sensitive to metal prices. When they move, profits don’t just rise gradually — they accelerate sharply.

A structural boost for metals

The longer-term backdrop for precious metals still looks supportive. Silver demand is driven by industrial uses such as solar, EVs, and electronics, alongside its role as a monetary hedge. At the same time, supply remains constrained due to long mine development timelines.

Gold is also benefiting from central bank demand and fiscal uncertainty, supporting the case for structurally higher prices over time.

Of course, this is not a low-risk business. Mining is operationally sensitive, and rising energy costs, falling grades, or production disruptions can quickly pressure margins even in strong price environments. Regulatory risk in Mexico is another factor investors cannot ignore.

But despite that volatility, I still think Fresnillo offers exposure to a structural precious metals trend that is far from over. That’s why I view it as one to consider alongside other long-term ISA holdings

Fallen giant

Diageo (LSE: DGE) has been one of the FTSE 100’s more painful large-cap performers in recent years.

But the key question for investors is whether this is a structural deterioration in the business — or simply a cyclical reset being mispriced by the market.

What matters is that underlying consumption trends have not collapsed. Consumers are still drinking, but they are trading down and moderating their spending rather than exiting the category entirely. That points to cyclical pressure, not a permanent demand shift.

Premiumisation — one of Diageo’s key long-term growth drivers — is also not broken. High-end brands such as Johnnie Walker, Tanqueray, and Don Julio continue to perform well, even if growth has become more uneven across price points.

In response, the group is adjusting its portfolio to meet demand where it’s strongest. This includes smaller pack formats and faster-growing ready-to-drink categories. That’s more about repositioning than strategic change.

The broader takeaway is that the market may be overpricing short-term weakness while underestimating the resilience of the underlying brand portfolio.

For long-term investors, that combination of cyclical pressure and structural strength is exactly where value opportunities tend to emerge — which is why I see Diageo as one to consider.

The post How to build a £20,000-a-year passive income from a Stocks and Shares ISA appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• Down 53% in the past 5 years. Is this the best value stock in the FTSE 100?
• Dear Diageo shareholders, mark your calendars for 6 August
• Down 31%, how much could £5,000 of Diageo shares be worth in 12 months?
• Here’s what is baffling me about the stock market today
• After years of pain, is the Diageo share price looking up?

Andrew Mackie has positions in Fresnillo Plc and Diageo. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Diageo Plc and Fresnillo Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Building passive income in a Stocks and Shares ISA can look deceptively simple. Buy quality shares, reinvest the dividends, and allow compounding to build momentum over time.

But there’s one factor many investors still underestimate: how costly delaying can become. Even the best long-term investing strategy becomes less effective if investors spend years waiting for the ‘perfect’ moment to begin.

That’s because successful passive income investing relies not just on owning strong businesses, but also on giving those investments enough time to compound.

The hidden cost of waiting

Compounding is usually shown as an upward-sloping chart. Invest early, stay invested, and wealth can grow significantly over time.

But the chart below flips that idea around. Instead of showing how wealth grows, it shows how much of the full compounding opportunity is still available depending on when an investor starts.

The decline is steeper than many investors realise. Assuming a 7% annual return over 20 years, an investor starting today has 100% of the available compounding opportunity. Wait five years and that falls to roughly 71%. By year 20, only about 26% of the original compounding opportunity remains for someone just starting at that point.

That’s because compounding is exponential. The earliest years carry disproportionate weight, as returns themselves begin generating further returns over time. Once those early years are gone, they cannot be recovered.

Which is why building passive income is not just about selecting strong dividend shares. It’s also about giving those investments enough time to compound.

Chart created by author

Stock compounder

The good news is that compounding isn’t limited to high-growth or speculative stocks. High-quality dividend shares that steadily grow earnings and cash flows can also become powerful long-term wealth builders when given enough time.

One FTSE 100 stock I believe fits that description well is Aviva (LSE: AV.)

The insurer is often viewed primarily through its headline dividend yield of 6.3%. But that framing misses how the business actually creates long-term value.

A clear strategic shift towards capital-light businesses, including wealth management and insurance, is improving returns on capital. Put simply, less capital is now required to generate each pound of earnings.

In addition, the group has resumed share buybacks and set new three-year targets running to 2028, centred on more than £7bn of cumulative cash remittances and stronger returns on equity. These cash flows underpin the company’s ability to support and grow shareholder returns over time.

In effect, value is created at two levels: through direct distributions to shareholders, and through reinvestment into higher-return areas of the business. That’s what makes this more than just a yield story.

What could go wrong

As a large insurer, Aviva remains exposed to financial market conditions, including interest rates and equity markets. These can influence both investment returns and capital generation.

Longer-term assumptions around longevity and insurance liabilities also remain a structural feature of the business model. Mispricing these risks can significantly dent profits.

However, taken together, the shift towards higher-quality earnings and strong capital return potential means the shares still look like one to consider for long-term compounding portfolios.

And crucially, as the earlier chart showed, delaying investment can quietly reduce the compounding opportunity available over time — making the timing of getting started just as important as the stock itself.

The post The best time to start a passive income ISA was yesterday – the second best is today appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• How much do you need in an ISA for a £1,525 monthly second income?
• How much should I invest in a SIPP to finish work and live off just dividend income?
• Plan to fund your retirement with just the State Pension? Good luck with that!
• How much is £7,620 saved in a Cash ISA a decade ago worth today?
• Are Aviva shares being held back by an overblown AI threat?

Andrew Mackie has positions in Aviva Plc. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Lloyds (LSE: LLOY) shares are often treated as a straightforward bet on the UK economy and interest rates. If growth slows or rates fall, investors tend to assume profits will come under pressure.

That thinking has shaped the investment case for years. But is this still the right lens through which to view the business? Or does it risk underestimating how earnings actually respond to changes in rates and the economy over time?

More resilient to rates than many assume

The traditional view of Lloyds is fairly straightforward. Falling interest rates are expected to squeeze banking margins, reduce profitability and weaken returns. For a UK-focused lender with a large mortgage book, that has long been seen as a major risk.

But the latest results suggest the picture may now be more nuanced. In its first-quarter update, the group actually increased its net interest income guidance for 2026. Net interest margin also improved to 3.17%, while management said structural hedge income is now expected to rise to more than £8bn by 2027.

That structural hedge is important. Put simply, it allows the bank to lock in returns on deposits over time rather than being immediately exposed to every shift in interest rates. As a result, the impact of lower rates can feed through more gradually than many investors assume, helping smooth earnings across the cycle.

None of this means rates no longer matter. But it does suggest Lloyds may now be less immediately vulnerable to rate movements than the market’s traditional playbook implies.

A broader earnings model is emerging

The bank is increasingly trying to diversify its sources of income beyond traditional lending.

Alongside its core retail and mortgage business, it’s building exposure to areas such as wealth management, commercial services, payments and consumer propositions. These are still relatively small contributors, but they are designed to add more stable, fee-based earnings over time.

Alongside this, there’s a clear focus on efficiency. Ongoing cost discipline and simplification efforts are supporting improved operating leverage, with management continuing to target stronger cost-to-income outcomes as the strategy develops.

Taken together, the direction of travel is towards a more balanced earnings mix. That doesn’t remove sensitivity to the UK economy. But it does suggest returns may become less dependent on a single driver and more influenced by execution, product mix and capital allocation over time.

What’s the verdict?

There are still clear risks to consider. Despite efforts to diversify earnings, the group remains heavily exposed to the UK economy.

A sharper slowdown in growth, weaker housing activity or a deterioration in employment conditions would still feed through into lending volumes and credit quality over time.

There’s also ongoing uncertainty around motor finance-related costs, which continues to sit in the background.

However, the broader picture is more balanced than the traditional narrative suggests. Earnings are being supported by a combination of strong capital generation, improving efficiency and a structural hedge that smooths the impact of interest rate changes. That doesn’t remove cyclical exposure, but it does change how quickly it feeds through.

For investors, the key question is whether the market fully reflects that shift. On current evidence, Lloyds still looks more resilient than the classic ‘rate-sensitive UK bank’ label implies, which could make the shares worth considering for long-term investors.

The post Are investors still using an outdated playbook to value Lloyds shares? appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• 16,976 more reasons why Lloyds share price could sink

Andrew Mackie has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Lloyds Banking Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Legal & General (LSE: LGEN) shares currently offer a dividend yield of around 8.6%, making them a clear favourite among income investors. In a market where reliable income is increasingly prized, that kind of yield naturally attracts attention.

But that may also be part of the problem.

The stock is often framed almost entirely as a high-yield income play — a steady distributor of cash in an uncertain world. Yet that characterisation risks overlooking how the business actually generates its returns.

So the real question is this: is Legal & General simply a dividend stock — or is the market missing a more complex and potentially more valuable story?

More than just a dividend stock

Viewing it purely through that income lens may be too simplistic.

While the dividend is clearly central to the investment case, it’s ultimately an output — not the business model itself. Focusing on yield alone risks missing how those distributions are generated in the first place.

At its core, the financial giant operates across pensions, asset management, and insurance, with earnings driven by long-term capital allocation and structural demand rather than short-term market moves.

That distinction matters. This is not simply a passive income vehicle. It’s a business that actively deploys capital across multiple areas, with returns shaped by how effectively that capital is allocated over time.

Understanding that difference is key to assessing what really drives the investment case.

A business driven by capital allocation

This becomes clearer when looking at how management actually runs the business.

Management has been clear that maintaining a sustainable and growing payout remains a priority. But capital allocation decisions are driven by opportunity and market conditions, not fixed formulas.

In practice, that means a choice. Cash can be returned to shareholders. Or it can be deployed into areas such as pension risk transfer, where demand remains strong and long-term returns can be attractive.

That flexibility matters. It shows the business is not simply distributing excess cash. It’s actively deciding where capital is put to work.

Even the interest rate backdrop is less of a constraint than it might appear. The group can shift its investment approach across government bonds, credit markets, and private assets to support returns.

Taken together, this is a business that is far more dynamic than the typical ‘income stock’ label suggests.

What could go wrong?

Of course, there are risks to this more dynamic investment case. Capital returns are not guaranteed. While the dividend remains the priority, share buybacks depend on coverage ratios, market conditions, and the availability of attractive opportunities.

There’s also sensitivity to the external environment. The group’s pension risk transfer business relies on favourable spreads and demand from corporate schemes. If market conditions shift — for example, if credit spreads tighten or gilt yields move sharply — returns on new business could come under pressure.

Finally, while capital allocation flexibility is a strength, it also introduces uncertainty. Investors are ultimately reliant on management making the right decisions about where and when to deploy capital.

In my view, that’s a trade-off worth accepting for a business that offers both income today and the potential for more than the market currently assumes.

The post Legal & General shares: still seen as a dividend stock — but that may be outdated appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• 3 top income-focused stocks to buy in May 2026, according to experts
• How to invest £150 a month in shares to target a £7,660 passive income for life
• The Legal & General share price is at a 10-year low – but the dividend income is stunning!
• How much do investors need in a SIPP to cover the UK’s £1,377 average rent?
• Here’s how much to put in your ISA if you hope for passive income of £21,000

Andrew Mackie has positions in Legal & General Group Plc. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Aviva  (LSE: AV.) shares have slipped back in recent months, falling from around 700p to closer to 620p. That may suggest confidence is starting to wobble. But one risk hanging over the stock deserves closer attention.

Self-driving cars are often seen as a long-term threat to insurers. Fewer accidents could mean lower demand for motor cover. But recent industry commentary suggests the timeline — and impact — may be less clear-cut than many assume.

That raises an important question. Is the market focusing too much on a distant risk, and not enough on the earnings power available today?

A long road to autonomy

Concerns around self-driving cars are not new. But recent commentary suggests the reality may be less immediate than headlines imply.

At its FY25 results in March, management pushed back on the idea of rapid disruption. Industry estimates point to widespread adoption not arriving until the 2040s. Even then, replacing the global car fleet would take decades and require trillions in investment.

More importantly, the transition is unlikely to be smooth. Autonomous and human-driven vehicles are expected to coexist for years, especially in complex driving conditions.

For insurers, that matters. Rather than a sudden drop in demand, the shift is likely to be gradual — giving established players time to adapt.

Built to adapt, not be disrupted

If the transition to autonomous driving is gradual, the next question is who is best placed to navigate it.

Here, scale and data could prove decisive. The group has already built a significant advantage through its telematics offering, with billions of miles of driving data collected over time. In a world where risk becomes more complex rather than disappearing, that kind of insight becomes increasingly valuable.

There is also a track record of adapting to change. The shift towards electric vehicles, more sophisticated pricing models, and evolving customer behaviour has already reshaped the motor insurance market in recent years. Each time, established players have adjusted rather than been displaced.

Crucially, even in a more automated future, insurance demand is unlikely to vanish. Instead, it may evolve. A mix of personal and commercial cover, alongside new types of risk, could emerge — favouring insurers with the scale, data, and underwriting expertise to respond.

Risks

Of course, the longer-term risk should not be ignored. If autonomous technology does eventually scale, it could fundamentally reshape the insurance market.

Fewer accidents would mean fewer claims, but also a smaller pool of premiums. Some estimates suggest accident frequency could fall sharply over time, which would put pressure on overall industry revenues.

There is also a potential shift in where risk sits. As vehicles become more autonomous, liability may move away from the driver and towards manufacturers and software providers, changing the structure of the market.

The biggest challenge, however, is uncertainty. Adoption is expected to be gradual and uneven, shaped by regulation, cost, and consumer behaviour. That makes it difficult for investors to judge exactly when and how any disruption will feed through into earnings.

Despite that, I see the current concern as more of a long-term evolution than an immediate threat. With a forward dividend yield of around 6.6% and strong cash generation today, I still see the shares as one for long-term income-focused investors to consider.

The post Are Aviva shares being held back by an overblown AI threat? appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• How much do you need in an ISA for a £1,525 monthly second income?
• How much should I invest in a SIPP to finish work and live off just dividend income?
• The best time to start a passive income ISA was yesterday – the second best is today
• Plan to fund your retirement with just the State Pension? Good luck with that!
• How much is £7,620 saved in a Cash ISA a decade ago worth today?

Andrew Mackie has positions in Aviva Plc. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

BP (LSE: BP.) shares are once again reacting sharply to geopolitical headlines, with oil prices swinging on comments around the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz. Moves like these continue to drive intraday sentiment across the sector.

But is the market still treating the oil major too much like a simple bet on the direction of oil prices?

In my opinion that view may be too narrow. I see its earnings profile as far more complex — and in some cases even benefiting from volatility.

Oil proxy

While oil prices clearly matter over the longer term, they don’t translate into earnings on a one-to-one basis. The relationship between headline commodity prices and reported financial performance is more complex than many investors assume.

That creates a disconnect. The market often reacts as though the company’s earnings move directly with daily oil price fluctuations, when in reality the transmission is more indirect and uneven.

Understanding that gap is key to assessing what really drives the investment case.

To see why, it helps to look at how the business actually generates its earnings.

Earnings don’t move in step with prices

Reported earnings are not a simple reflection of spot oil prices. Instead, they are shaped by timing effects, contract structures, and pricing mechanisms that mean changes in crude prices don’t flow through immediately — or evenly — into financial results.

For example, the company noted during Q1 that some Gulf of America sales are priced on a one-month lag, meaning current oil price movements may only appear in earnings in later periods. Similar timing effects occur across its trading and production portfolio.

Refining adds another layer of complexity. Margins are influenced not just by crude prices, but also by product spreads, freight costs, and regional differentials. As a result, realised margins can diverge meaningfully from widely watched industry indicators.

The key point is that BP’s earnings are staggered and multi-layered, not a direct mirror of day-to-day oil price movements.

What’s the verdict?

Even if BP is more complex than a simple oil proxy, it’s still exposed to structural earnings volatility.

Upstream performance remains tied to commodity cycles over time. Refining margins can swing sharply depending on product spreads and regional differentials, while trading results add another layer of variability. In other words, complexity doesn’t equal stability.

That matters because it feeds into how the market values the business. Earnings are inherently difficult to forecast, and cash flows can be uneven from period to period.

As a result, oil majors trade as much on sentiment as fundamentals. That raises an important question for investors: even if the market misreads the earnings structure, will that mispricing actually correct?

In other words, complexity may reduce the simplicity of the ‘oil bet’ narrative — but it doesn’t necessarily remove uncertainty, either in earnings or in valuation.

For me, that mix of volatility and visibility is exactly the point. I view BP as a portfolio hedge. Its exposure to energy shocks and inflationary cycles offers diversification, while cash generation and dividends behave differently from broader equity market drivers over time.

That’s why I continue to hold it as part of my portfolio, and view it as one to consider.

The post BP shares: still treated as an oil bet — but that may be outdated appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• How much do you need in an ISA for a £692 weekly passive income?
• Here’s why 2026 has been bumpy for the BP share price

Andrew Mackie has positions in Bp P.l.c. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

National Grid (LSE: NG.) shares are quietly becoming one of the stock market’s go-to defensive plays. Volatility is back. Investors are looking for stability.

As a regulated utility, its earnings are largely shielded from economic cycles. Instead, they are driven by long-term infrastructure investment and regulatory frameworks. That gives the business strong visibility. In today’s uncertain macro environment, that matters more than ever.

But the investment case may be shifting. This is no longer just a defensive income story. Electricity networks now sit at the centre of two major structural trends: the rise of artificial intelligence and the rapid electrification of industry and transport.

That changes the narrative. The question is no longer just about stability. It’s whether the market fully recognises the company’s role in powering the next wave of demand growth.

Electrification

What is changing is not the regulatory model, but the demand placed on it. Electricity networks are no longer supporting a stable, mature system — they are becoming the constraint in a rapidly electrifying economy.

AI infrastructure, data centres, and the shift towards electric transport and heating are all driving a step-change in power demand. Crucially, that demand does not spread evenly across the system. It concentrates around grid capacity, turning networks into a critical bottleneck.

That has important implications. When capacity becomes scarce, investment follows — and for regulated operators, that feeds directly into a growing asset base and higher allowed returns over time. In effect, demand growth translates into earnings visibility rather than volatility.

Seen through that lens, National Grid looks less like a passive income stock and more like core infrastructure for a structurally expanding electricity system.

Accelerating demand

That demand story is not theoretical — it’s already feeding through into investment plans.

The company is currently working to connect up to 19GW of additional electricity demand in the UK by the early 2030s. Strikingly, roughly half of that is expected to come from data centres alone — a clear signal of how quickly AI is reshaping electricity consumption.

To support that, investment is ramping up at pace. More than £5bn was deployed in the first half alone, with full-year spending expected to exceed £11bn. Over the longer term, a £60bn programme is set to expand the regulated asset base, driving roughly 10% annual growth.

That matters because, in a regulated model, higher investment feeds directly into future earnings. What looks like a stable utility on the surface is, in reality, gearing up for a sustained period of demand-led expansion.

What’s the verdict

Of course, there are risks. National Grid’s growth depends on heavy investment, which means higher debt. If interest rates stay elevated, borrowing costs could rise and put pressure on returns and the share price.

At the same time, as a regulated business, allowed returns are not entirely within management’s control, creating some uncertainty over how quickly higher costs can be passed through.

That said, in my view, the scale of demand now building across electricity networks is easy to underestimate. As investment translates into a larger asset base and more predictable earnings, I see this as a business with both defensive qualities and long-term growth potential — which is why I view the stock as one to consider.

The post National Grid shares: a classic sleep-well stock for uncertain markets? appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• £503 buys 14 shares in this FTSE 250 stock that returned 23.9% annually for the last 15 years
• £1,000 buys 25 shares in this FTSE 100 stock that’s returned 29.2% annually for the last 10 years
• Down 47%, is this growth stock finally worth buying in May?
• 2 REITs yielding 7%+ to consider for passive income in 2026
• Just 97 shares of this UK dividend stock generate £238 in passive income

Andrew Mackie owns shares in National Grid. The Motley Fool UK has recommended National Grid Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Beneath the surface, a subtle shift is taking place in the stock market. Investors are increasingly focusing on near-term earnings and cash flows, rather than distant promises of future growth.

This move back towards an earnings-driven phase means fundamentals such as cash flow strength and balance sheet quality are becoming more important for valuation.

That shift could have significant implications for the FTSE 100. It’s particularly relevant given its heavy exposure to traditional sectors such as banks, miners, and energy companies.

These industries are closely tied to earnings trends and broader economic conditions, making them more sensitive when market focus turns back towards fundamentals. So is the FTSE 100 now shifting into a more sustained earnings-driven phase?

Market shift

The stock market’s growing focus on earnings reflects a broader shift in the macroeconomic environment. After a long period where low interest rates supported distant growth stories, investors are now operating in a very different backdrop.

Higher inflation, more volatile interest rate expectations, and renewed geopolitical risk have all contributed to a reassessment of valuation. In this environment, future cash flows are being discounted more heavily, which naturally increases the importance of near-term earnings strength.

At the same time, higher-for-longer interest rates have restored the relevance of capital discipline. Companies are once again being judged on their ability to generate cash today, rather than promises of growth further out.

FTSE 100 earnings power in focus

Nowhere is this earnings-driven shift more visible than in its core sectors. Banks, energy companies, and miners all sit at the centre of the index and are highly sensitive to changes in earnings visibility and macro conditions.

Barclays reflects the interest rate and credit cycle, while BP remains closely tied to oil prices and cash flow generation. Both highlight how quickly earnings expectations can shift in the current environment.

But Glencore (LSE: GLEN) stands out. Its earnings have traditionally been driven by cyclical commodity prices, particularly copper. However, that story is beginning to change. Copper is increasingly being viewed as a structural demand metal, driven by the AI build-out, electrification of grids, and long-term industrial demand, while supply remains constrained.

Structural growth

That shift is already starting to change how the business is being positioned. Rather than being treated purely as a cyclical commodities producer, the miner is increasingly being viewed through the lens of earnings durability and long-term demand visibility.

If that narrative holds, it alters how investors think about earnings stability. Instead of being driven solely by short-term commodity cycles, future performance would be underpinned by structurally stronger demand dynamics for copper, zinc, cobalt, and nickel.

The risk is that this transition is not linear. Commodity prices remain volatile, and global growth — particularly in China — still plays a dominant role in short-term earnings outcomes.

The bottom line

Taken together, these shifts point to a stock market that is becoming more focused on fundamentals. Earnings visibility, cash generation, and balance sheet strength are regaining importance after years where sentiment and long-duration growth dominated.

For FTSE 100 investors, that means greater emphasis on business quality and earnings durability, and less tolerance for uncertainty.

In my view, that tilt towards fundamentals is a positive development for a market dominated by cash-generative businesses. It reinforces a more disciplined market backdrop, even amid ongoing economic uncertainty.

The post Why the stock market is shifting back to an earnings-driven regime appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• £503 buys 14 shares in this FTSE 250 stock that returned 23.9% annually for the last 15 years
• £1,000 buys 25 shares in this FTSE 100 stock that’s returned 29.2% annually for the last 10 years
• Down 47%, is this growth stock finally worth buying in May?
• 2 REITs yielding 7%+ to consider for passive income in 2026
• Just 97 shares of this UK dividend stock generate £238 in passive income

Andrew Mackie has positions in Bp P.l.c. and Glencore Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

The FTSE 100 has dropped 0.9% at the open today (5 May), dragged lower by a 5% slump in HSBC (LSE: HSBA) shares after underwhelming results. With oil prices also surging on escalating Middle East tensions, investors may be wondering whether this is a short-term wobble or a sign of deeper pressure on the market.

Q1 results

Q1 earnings from the Asian-focused bank showed a mixed picture, with investors focusing more on rising risks than steady top-line growth.

Revenues rose around 6% year on year, supported by stronger performance in wealth management and higher net interest income. However, sentiment was weighed down by a notable increase in credit losses, which rose to $1.3bn, up $0.4bn from the same period last year.

This was partly driven by a fraud-related charge in UK corporate and institutional banking. In addition, a more cautious economic outlook reflected heightened geopolitical uncertainty and soaring oil prices.

Costs also increased, driven by inflationary pressures, higher performance-related pay, and continued investment in technology. Despite this, management reaffirmed its medium-term targets, including a return on tangible equity of 17% through to 2028.

So are investors reassured by the resilience in revenue or more concerned about the growing signs of credit stress?

What the sell-off is really telling investors

The sharp early sell-off reflects a shift in how investors are weighing growth against risk. Revenue growth and profitability remain broadly resilient, but rising credit losses have added to concerns that the economic backdrop is weakening faster than expected.

Expected credit losses are now higher, signalling potential stress building in lending portfolios at a time of already elevated global uncertainty.

Banks face particular pressure in this environment. Credit provisions act as a forward-looking measure of asset quality. So any increase tends to weigh on sentiment even when headline profits hold up.

Rising oil prices and escalating geopolitical tensions are adding to that pressure. They are fuelling concerns about persistent inflation and slower growth. This is raising fears of a return to a 1970s-style stagflationary environment. That backdrop increases the risk of further loan impairments.

Against this backdrop, investors are reassessing whether current earnings strength is sustainable or masks emerging weakness beneath the surface.

The result is a clear market tension: resilient near-term performance versus growing uncertainty about the outlook. That uncertainty is driving the move in early trading.

What’s the verdict?

Looking beyond near-term volatility, one of the more important signals in the results was the resilience in net interest margin. It was 1.6%, slightly lower than the previous quarter. However, it still points to a relatively supportive interest rate environment for lenders compared with the ultra-low rate era.

More broadly, persistently higher oil prices and sticky inflation make a return to near-zero interest rates unlikely. That is particularly true given already elevated levels of global debt.

This matters for long-term earnings power. A higher-rate environment supports structurally stronger net interest income, even if credit conditions fluctuate.

For long-term investors, the key question is whether short-term credit concerns are masking a more durable earnings opportunity in a higher-rate world. I think the combination of resilient margins and a structurally higher rate environment continues to support the long-term earnings case, despite near-term volatility.

The post FTSE 100 falls as HSBC shares drop 5% after earnings miss – investors weigh up rising risks appeared first on The Twelfth Magpie.

More reading

• ISA millionaires are tipped to treble! How to boost your chances of becoming one
• Here’s how a stock market crash could actually be great for your retirement planning!
• How much do you need an ISA for a £31,352 second income?
• Here are the lazy passive income streams paying me while I sleep
• HSBC shares plunged 5% on Tuesday. Here’s what I did…

HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Andrew Mackie has positions in HSBC Holdings. The Motley Fool UK has recommended HSBC Holdings. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.