We have some exciting news to share! The Motley Fool UK has now become The Twelfth Magpie -- an independent, UK-owned company, led by our long-serving UK management team — Mark Rogers, Chris Nials and Heather Adlington. In practical terms, it’s the same team you know, now fully focused on serving our UK readers and members.

Just as importantly, our approach remains unchanged: long-term, jargon-free, and on your side. This site is our new home, and there will be extra tweaks made across the coming few days as we settle in. So if anything looks a little off, please bear with us!

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Is 30 too late to start investing?

Is it too late to start investing at the age of 30? Our writer’s answer is an emphatic no — but he explains some things to watch out for too.

A young woman sitting on a couch looking at a book in a quiet library space.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Again and again the message comes through: long-term financial planning should start early. As in, really early. So while many people spend their twenties focussed more on the now than the long-term future, time ticks away and one’s lifetime investment horizon grows shorter. That’s important because holding some investments for just a few years more can make the difference between good returns and superb ones. But what if, at the age of 30, one still has not put a penny into investments? Is it still worth the effort to start investing?

The point of investing

People approach buying shares with different objectives. But for most of us, the idea is to build our personal wealth over the long term. That can be in the form of share price appreciation, dividend income, or a combination of both.

XXX

Like many things in life, the later one starts, the less time one has to do something. But just because the returns may be smaller, that does not mean that they are not still worth aiming for.

To take an example, imagine you invested £1,000 a year in a range of shares with an average yield of 5%, like SSE and DS Smith, then reinvested the dividends as you went along. At the age of 65, your investment pot should be worth around £121,000.

If you waited until you were 30 to begin, the total at 65 would be close to £74,000. You would still have invested for 78% as long, but the final value would only be 61% of what you could have managed by starting at 20.

That is partly because there would be an extra 10 years of contributions. But it also reflects the power of compounding. Compounding is one of the reasons a slightly longer timeframe can lead to dramatically better investment results.

Starting at 30

But while the returns beginning at 30 are far less than at 20, they are still very worthwhile, in my view! Indeed, in the example above if one did not start investing until 40, the total value of the investment at 65 would be £42,000.

So if I was 30 without a share in my name, I would still think it is worthwhile to invest. Indeed, I would begin putting aside money immediately. I would also consider setting up a share-dealing account or Stocks and Shares ISA to house my investments.

Start investing as you mean to go on

One mistake I would try to avoid, though, is making up for lost time in the wrong ways.

I could make up for lost time to some extent by paying in a higher amount of money. I think that could make sense. But some people try to make up for lost time by investing their hard-earned cash in unnecessarily risky shares, because they are greedy for returns.

That is understandable but I think it is also stupid. Higher risk shares may offer me the promise of higher returns too. But I could well end up doing far worse than if I stuck to less lucrative but lower risk shares. It is never too late to start investing. But I think it pays at any age to hunt for quality businesses with exceptional long-term prospects.

Christopher Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended DS Smith. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Friends and sisters exploring the outdoors together in Cornwall. They are standing with their arms around each other at the coast.
Investing Articles

£503 buys 14 shares in this FTSE 250 stock that returned 23.9% annually for the last 15 years

This FTSE 250 stock has averaged a huge return for 15 years. At today's price, £503 buys 14 shares. But…

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

£1,000 buys 25 shares in this FTSE 100 stock that’s returned 29.2% annually for the last 10 years

This FTSE 100 mining stock has returned close to 30% a year for a decade. At 3,995p, £1,000 buys 25…

Read more »

Female student sitting at the steps and using laptop
Investing Articles

Down 47%, is this growth stock finally worth buying in May?

With a £288m order book and a hidden pipeline of defence and nuclear contracts, is this growth stock now too…

Read more »

House models and one with REIT - standing for real estate investment trust - written on it.
Investing Articles

2 REITs yielding 7%+ to consider for passive income in 2026

A REIT backed by the NHS and another backed by Tesco and Sainsbury's with both yielding 7%+. Here's why I'm…

Read more »

Woman riding her old fashioned bicycle along the Beach Esplanade at Aberdeen, Scotland.
Investing Articles

Just 97 shares of this UK dividend stock generate £238 in passive income

A 5.7% yield, £238 in passive income from just 97 shares, and one of the most divisive dividend stocks on…

Read more »

ISA coins
Investing Articles

£10,000 in an ISA generates a second income of…

The London Stock Exchange is home to some of the world's most generous dividends. But how big a second income…

Read more »

Shot of a senior man drinking coffee and looking thoughtfully out of a window
Investing Articles

Expert recommendations: 2 top income stocks yielding 7%+!

With yields of 7.2% and 7.8% respectively, these two income stocks are catching the eyes of institutional analysts. Should investors…

Read more »

Illustration of flames over a black background
Investing Articles

3 top income-focused stocks to buy in May 2026, according to experts

Looking for a stock to buy for income in May 2026? Experts have flagged these three UK dividend shares as…

Read more »