We have some exciting news to share! The Motley Fool UK has now become The Twelfth Magpie -- an independent, UK-owned company, led by our long-serving UK management team — Mark Rogers, Chris Nials and Heather Adlington. In practical terms, it’s the same team you know, now fully focused on serving our UK readers and members.

Just as importantly, our approach remains unchanged: long-term, jargon-free, and on your side. This site is our new home, and there will be extra tweaks made across the coming few days as we settle in. So if anything looks a little off, please bear with us!

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Which Is The Better Pick For Your Portfolio: GlaxoSmithKline plc Or AstraZeneca plc?

Should you chose GlaxoSmithKline (LON: GSK) or AstraZeneca (LON: AZN) for your portfolio?

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) and AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) are similar businesses, but if you could only pick one then choosing between the two is difficult.

It really comes down to your personal investment goals — are you looking for income or growth?

XXX

Income pick

Glaxo is the income play of the two pharma giants.  The company’s shares currently support a dividend yield of 5.5%, and management has made a commitment to maintaining the payout at its present level until 2017. 

Unfortunately, Glaxo’s management has also stated that the dividend payout won’t grow over the next three years, which is disappointing. Still, there’s scope for serious payout growth after 2017. 

Room for growth

The next three years will be a transitional period for Glaxo. The company expects 2015 core earnings per share to decline at a percentage rate “in the high teens” as sales of key drugs continue to fall.

However, new treatments will start to work their way through the company’s treatment pipeline by 2016. These new products, combined with Glaxo’s drive to cut costs by £3bn per annum by 2017, will lead to slow and steady earnings growth. 

Glaxo’s management believes that group’s revenue will grow at a low-to-mid single digit percentage per annum from 2016 to 2020. During the same period, core earnings per share are expected to expand at a rate in the mid-to-high single digits. 

City analysts believe that Glaxo’s earnings per share will fall by 11% this year before rebounding by 7% during 2016.

According to my figures, assuming a 7% per annum growth rate through to 2020, Glaxo is on track to earn 111p per share for full-year 2020. This indicates that Glaxo is trading at a 2020 P/E of 13.2. 

Exciting prospects 

Astra, on the other hand, is expecting to grow at a much faster rate than Glaxo over the next five years. 

Astra currently has 72 new cancer treatments under development, 31 of which are immuno-oncology drugs. 13 immuno-oncology drug trials are under way, with a further 16 planned at the end of November last year.

And it’s this wave of new treatments that has given Astra’s management the confidence to state that revenues will hit $45bn by 2023. 

According to my figures, which are based on Astra’s historic profit margins, on revenue of $45bn the company could report a net profit of $9bn, around £5.6bn. This translates into earnings per share of £4.43.

So, based on these figures, Astra is currently trading at a 2023 P/E of 10. 

Extra income 

Astra is set to grow rapidly over the next decade, but the company also supports a dividend yield of 4% at present. The payout is covered 1.5 times by earnings per share and isn’t expected to grow over the next few years. 

Still, a yield of 4% is above the market average of 3.4%. 

The bottom line

All in all, I’d argue that the choice is simple. If you’re looking for income, Glaxo is the better pick. However, if you’re looking for a growth play, Astra could be the best choice.

That being said, Astra does support a dividend yield of 4%, which is above the market average and complements the company’s long-term growth profile extremely well. If income investors are willing to accept a the reduced level of income, in exchange for growth potential, Astra could be the best bet. 

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Friends and sisters exploring the outdoors together in Cornwall. They are standing with their arms around each other at the coast.
Investing Articles

£503 buys 14 shares in this FTSE 250 stock that returned 23.9% annually for the last 15 years

This FTSE 250 stock has averaged a huge return for 15 years. At today's price, £503 buys 14 shares. But…

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

£1,000 buys 25 shares in this FTSE 100 stock that’s returned 29.2% annually for the last 10 years

This FTSE 100 mining stock has returned close to 30% a year for a decade. At 3,995p, £1,000 buys 25…

Read more »

Female student sitting at the steps and using laptop
Investing Articles

Down 47%, is this growth stock finally worth buying in May?

With a £288m order book and a hidden pipeline of defence and nuclear contracts, is this growth stock now too…

Read more »

House models and one with REIT - standing for real estate investment trust - written on it.
Investing Articles

2 REITs yielding 7%+ to consider for passive income in 2026

A REIT backed by the NHS and another backed by Tesco and Sainsbury's with both yielding 7%+. Here's why I'm…

Read more »

Woman riding her old fashioned bicycle along the Beach Esplanade at Aberdeen, Scotland.
Investing Articles

Just 97 shares of this UK dividend stock generate £238 in passive income

A 5.7% yield, £238 in passive income from just 97 shares, and one of the most divisive dividend stocks on…

Read more »

ISA coins
Investing Articles

£10,000 in an ISA generates a second income of…

The London Stock Exchange is home to some of the world's most generous dividends. But how big a second income…

Read more »

Shot of a senior man drinking coffee and looking thoughtfully out of a window
Investing Articles

Expert recommendations: 2 top income stocks yielding 7%+!

With yields of 7.2% and 7.8% respectively, these two income stocks are catching the eyes of institutional analysts. Should investors…

Read more »

Illustration of flames over a black background
Investing Articles

3 top income-focused stocks to buy in May 2026, according to experts

Looking for a stock to buy for income in May 2026? Experts have flagged these three UK dividend shares as…

Read more »