We have some exciting news to share! The Motley Fool UK has now become The Twelfth Magpie -- an independent, UK-owned company, led by our long-serving UK management team — Mark Rogers, Chris Nials and Heather Adlington. In practical terms, it’s the same team you know, now fully focused on serving our UK readers and members.

Just as importantly, our approach remains unchanged: long-term, jargon-free, and on your side. This site is our new home, and there will be extra tweaks made across the coming few days as we settle in. So if anything looks a little off, please bear with us!

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Why I’d avoid AstraZeneca shares and buy this FTSE 100 stock

Roland Head isn’t comfortable with AstraZeneca’s latest results. He reckons there’s better value elsewhere in the FTSE 100 (INDEXFTSE: UKX).

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) share price has risen by more than 90% since May 2016 as investors have bought into CEO Pascal Soriot’s more focused strategy for the business.

However, the shares dipped on Friday after Mr Soriot warned that 2020 earnings may be hit by the coronavirus outbreak. In this piece I’ll explain why I think there are broader reasons to be careful about buying AstraZeneca.

XXX

I’ll also take a look at a FTSE 100 stock that’s very unpopular at the moment. I reckon it could be a contrarian buy.

Astra-nomical adjustments

AstraZeneca’s 2019 results looked good at first glance. The firm’s adjusted ‘core’ measure of operating profit rose by 13% to $6,436m, while sales rose 12% to $23,565m. Core earnings of $3.50 per share were only slightly below broker forecasts of $3.59 per share.

Although most companies use adjusted profits, I feel that AstraZeneca’s approach to calculating its core profits is aggressive and excludes some costs that should really be left in.

The 2019 results are a good example. The group’s core operating profit was $6,436m. But its reported operating profit, which includes all standard accounting costs, fell by 14% to $2,924m. That’s less than half the core figure.

What on earth?

I might accept such large adjustments if they only happened occasionally, perhaps following a major acquisition. But at AstraZeneca, there’s a similar divide every year.

The main reason for this is that AstraZeneca excludes the amortisation of intangible assets from its core profits. This non-cash accounting charge relates to the gradual reduction in value of intellectual property such as patents, licences and software. As you can imagine, this kind of asset is a big part of a pharmaceutical business — AstraZeneca carries about $21bn of intangible assets on its balance sheet, reflecting historic spending.

Last year, the amortisation charge on these assets was $2,497m. In 2018 it was $2,345m. And in 2017 it was $1,807m. As you can see, this charge is quite similar each year. It accounts for most of the difference between the firm’s core and reported profits.

Using my preferred measure of reported profit, AstraZeneca generated an operating profit margin of just 12.4%. That’s well below rival GlaxoSmithKline‘s figure of 20.6%.

AstraZeneca currently trades on about 23 times 2020 forecast earnings, with a dividend yield of just 2.8%. I’m not convinced the stock offers much value at this level.

A great British brand

I’ve been bearish on engineering group Rolls-Royce Holding (LSE: RR) for a long time. The market caught up with my views last year, wiping nearly 30% off Rolls’ share price.

However, I’m starting to wonder if it might be time for a fresh look. There’s now just one major problem remaining with the group’s troubled Trent 100 TEN engine. A fix isn’t expected until 2021, but this news is now public and has been factored into the firm’s financial planning.

The rest of the jet engine business seems to be performing well enough. Trading is also stable in the group’s Defence and Power Systems businesses.

In November, Rolls confirmed its “mid-term ambition” for free cash flow of £1 per share. If this can be achieved, then I think the shares would look very cheap at under 700p. This level of free cash flow could also support an attractive dividend.

Risks remain. But I’m planning to take a close look at the firm’s results later this month. I’m starting to get interested.

Roland Head owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool UK has recommended AstraZeneca. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Friends and sisters exploring the outdoors together in Cornwall. They are standing with their arms around each other at the coast.
Investing Articles

£503 buys 14 shares in this FTSE 250 stock that returned 23.9% annually for the last 15 years

This FTSE 250 stock has averaged a huge return for 15 years. At today's price, £503 buys 14 shares. But…

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

£1,000 buys 25 shares in this FTSE 100 stock that’s returned 29.2% annually for the last 10 years

This FTSE 100 mining stock has returned close to 30% a year for a decade. At 3,995p, £1,000 buys 25…

Read more »

Female student sitting at the steps and using laptop
Investing Articles

Down 47%, is this growth stock finally worth buying in May?

With a £288m order book and a hidden pipeline of defence and nuclear contracts, is this growth stock now too…

Read more »

House models and one with REIT - standing for real estate investment trust - written on it.
Investing Articles

2 REITs yielding 7%+ to consider for passive income in 2026

A REIT backed by the NHS and another backed by Tesco and Sainsbury's with both yielding 7%+. Here's why I'm…

Read more »

Woman riding her old fashioned bicycle along the Beach Esplanade at Aberdeen, Scotland.
Investing Articles

Just 97 shares of this UK dividend stock generate £238 in passive income

A 5.7% yield, £238 in passive income from just 97 shares, and one of the most divisive dividend stocks on…

Read more »

ISA coins
Investing Articles

£10,000 in an ISA generates a second income of…

The London Stock Exchange is home to some of the world's most generous dividends. But how big a second income…

Read more »

Shot of a senior man drinking coffee and looking thoughtfully out of a window
Investing Articles

Expert recommendations: 2 top income stocks yielding 7%+!

With yields of 7.2% and 7.8% respectively, these two income stocks are catching the eyes of institutional analysts. Should investors…

Read more »

Illustration of flames over a black background
Investing Articles

3 top income-focused stocks to buy in May 2026, according to experts

Looking for a stock to buy for income in May 2026? Experts have flagged these three UK dividend shares as…

Read more »